|
The California State University
Annual Campus Technology Survey
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
About This Survey
The CSU Campus Technology Survey for Fiscal Year
2001/2002 is one of several system data collection
activities pertaining to information technology in the
California State University. Related activities include
biennial opinion surveys of students, faculty and staff, and
annual reports from centrally managed programs and
information systems. The division of Information Technology
Services has responsibility for these activities.
To minimize the burden on campuses, all collection of
data about information technology originating in the
Chancellor's Office will be coordinated. Data requests from
any system division for whatever purpose will be
incorporated into annual, scheduled survey activities. Use
of the Web is intended to streamline and facilitate the
survey process. Terms requiring clarification or
interpretation are underlined. Clicking on them will take
the reader to a separate document where the necessary
information is provided.
The primary purpose of the annual campus technology
survey is to meet a Legislative reporting requirement
associated with State support for improving the technology
infrastructure of the CSU. In return for investments
totaling some $243 million over a three-year period, the CSU
agreed to provide annual reports through 2008 on the impact
of those investments. Data collected to meet the State
reporting requirement will be reported for the system as a
whole. Individual campus profiles will be not be included.
Information gathered this year will also be used to inform
and to evaluate implementation of the Operations and Support
Strategies component of the CSU's Integrated Technology
Strategy - Technology Infrastructure Initiative.
Questions in the current survey were asked in the same or
similar form in the 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 surveys and will
be asked each year through 2008. The intent is to measure
change over time on a series of important indicators related
to the goals of the Integrated Technology Strategy
(ITS).
The survey is divided into four parts. Part A asks for
the name of the campus and information about the person
submitting the data. Part B asks 13 sets of questions
related to ITS initiatives. Part C asks for information
about the campus IT environment. Part D provides an
opportunity for respondents to comment on issues raised by
the survey.
Submission of the Survey
Only one person designated by the campus president, or
his/her designee, will be given a password and the URL to
submit the completed survey on behalf of the campus. To
facilitate consultation with campus constituencies,
read-only access to the survey form is provided here.
Deadline for Receipt of Survey
The deadline for submitting this survey is August 1,
2002.
More Information
If you have questions about the purpose or scope of this
survey, interpretation of survey questions, or the uses that
will be made of data received, contact Stephen Daigle,
Senior Research Associate, Information Technology Services,
at steved@calstate.edu.
A Final Comment
The Legislature invited the CSU to demonstrate the value
of its investments in the CSU technology infrastructure
against a set of measurable criteria. The strategy we have
adopted is to document how these investments translate into
improvements in learning and teaching, personal
productivity, administrative productivity, and the quality
of the student experience, the outcomes articulated in the
CSU Integrated Technology Strategy.
The CSU Annual Campus Technology Survey was developed by
a workgroup under the oversight of David Ernst, Assistant
Vice Chancellor for Information Technology Services. The
workgroup included two campus chief technology/information
officers, two institutional research directors, two
representatives of the California State Students
Association, two senior staff members from the Chancellor's
Office division of Academic Affairs, and two senior staff
from the division of Information Technology Services.
Content specifications and survey questionnaire items were
modified based on feedback from senior staff in system
offices with relevant programmatic responsibility, and from
members of the CSU Information Technology Advisory
Committee.
|